johann wrote:I don't think California's unaccredited religious schools would have anything to worry about, Jimmy. They file yearly as "exempt", according to this sheet, so I'm guessing the State-allowed religious exemption will go on untouched. http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/rpt/2007-R-0023.htm
I'm pretty sure they're not the target -and they won't be "collateral damage" either.
Johann
nosborne48 wrote:Handing all the power to any private association is troubling.
If the state government is going to regulate some commercial activity, which is a major function of state governments in general, the GOVERNMENT is who should do the regulating. Generally, they do. Supreme Courts regulate law practice. State boards of accounting, engineering, medicine, interior design, dentistry, chiropractic, all of these and many more regulate their licensees.
Imposing a blanket knee-jerk requirement for accreditation places schools at the mercy of private regulators and deprives the schools of established routes for administrative or judicial appeal.
cbkent wrote:It would be a shame if CA correspondence and online law schools went away.
ABA accredited ULV boasts $75,000 tuition for the entire course.
My bar qualifying JD cost me $8000 in tuition for the entire program. Of course, that was almost 15 years ago.
Why pay $75,0000 to $150,000 for a bar card and no job when you can get a bar card and no job for substantially less?
RGable wrote:Yes, all unaccredited schools should be closed. Many of these schools are profit-centers for entrepreneurs who exploit foreign students.
Oregon wrote:So you are saying there can never be any new schools ever allowed. Schools don't start with accreditation.
Who gives a rat's ass about foreign students?
SteveFoerster wrote:Anyone who sees the drawback in the U.S. earning a reputation for being a place where you can cheat foreigners with impunity, for starters.
Return to Unaccredited Programs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest